Majyd Aziz
“Mickey Mouse is a funny animal
cartoon character and the official mascot
of The Walt Disney Company. He
was created by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks
at the Walt Disney Studios
in 1928. An anthropomorphic mouse who
typically wears red shorts, large yellow shoes, and white gloves, Mickey has
become one of the most recognizable cartoon characters in the world.” ~ Wikipedia
Walt Disney took an animal that is usually found in filth, in dirty
holes, and in polluted sewers and transformed it into an intelligent, endearing
and adorable icon loved by millions of children and even adults. Mickey Mouse
is 86 years old, and the company he and his fellow cartoon characters “represent”
all over the globe is the largest in terms of appointing licensees and vendors
for various products that proudly carry the Disney logo.
The Walt Disney Company has an enlightened and focused approach
towards its Corporate Social Responsibility policies. According to its official
website, “it is committed to act and create in an
ethical manner. This commitment is essential in maintaining the value and
unique appeal of the Disney brand for the benefit of our shareholders, our
employees, our business partners and, most importantly, our customers around
the world. This commitment extends to our own operations and to the
independent licensees, vendors, and facilities involved in the production and
distribution of Disney-branded consumer products. . . . We have long recognized
the great challenges this vast extended supply chain creates in working to
ensure that the consumer products bearing our brands meet our expectations for
the highest ethical standards and highest quality.
Disney has licensees and vendors in many countries. It has a
very strict monitoring system and also relies on International Labor Organization
and International Finance Corporation standards under their Better Work program. The Permitted Sourcing Countries Policy is a
refined method and enables Disney to effectively manage and to ensure an
ethical conduct by all in the supply chain. However, this does not mean that
Disney gives a carte blanche to all those desirous of becoming official
licensees or vendors. In fact, Disney does not do business in forty-four
countries that do not qualify above the threshold of 25 points under the World
Governance Index. Countries like Zambia, Mongolia and even Burkina Faso qualify
but now Pakistan has been removed from the list of Permitted Sourcing
Countries.
The Disney announcement did not spring up overnight. The
warning signals were sent over a year ago to the licensees and vendors in
Pakistan citing safety standards of workers in the supply chain. The decision was prompted by
the 24 November 2012 fire at the Tazreen Fashions Factory in Bangladesh's capital
Dhaka that killed 117 people and injured over 200 and another fire on 11 September
2012 in Baldia, Karachi Pakistan where 262 garment workers lost their lives and
600 workers were injured. The licensees and vendors in Pakistan claim an annual
Disney business in excess of $200 million and these are big names in the
textile sector. They have assiduously worked hard to adhere to the rigid and
tough standards and policies of Disney and it is to their credit that they have
prospered.
Unfortunately, the lackadaisical attitude of government
functionaries and the laid-back manner in which global conditionalities are considered
by the bureaucracy have brought Pakistan nothing but shame and blame. The
Pakistani officialdom does not comprehend the intricacies of a nut-and-bolt methodology
of the international brands that have to adhere to the progressive demands of
their customers on a priority. This is no IMF or World Bank dictation that
these officials conveniently side-step or evade. International evaluation, such
as the Disney decision, is the core issue that cannot be disregarded. It is pathetic
that most of the government officials who deal with labor standards, who do not
miss a single opportunity to go on ILO junkets or conferences, are totally
oblivious of the ramifications of the Disney decision. It is a sad fact that
the big names in the textile industry have to run from pillar to post to
convince the policymakers to get on the ball and right the wrong.
Mr S M Muneer, the well-known tycoon, has taken up the mantle of
CEO of TDAP. The ball is now in his court. He must get a detailed orientation
from the affected licensees and vendors as to what went haywire. Then he should
bring on the carpet all those irresponsible officials for their lax and
nonchalant behavior. For crying out loud, thousands of jobs and the country’s
image are on stake and the financial consequences for those who toil to
manufacture quality products would be unbearable and devastating. The leaders
of the textile sector have to get their act together. One is not sure how much
personal lobbying they did with the Disney people. News reports reveal that
even Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, Jalil Abbas Jilani, did attempt
individual intervention but he was not able to get Disney to review the
decision.
This writer has been advocating for many years that the Pakistani
private sector must create a Lobbying Fund and must appoint lobbyists in Washington
to work on the policymakers there as well as in Congress. There is a need for a
pro-active approach but the private sector is wanting in this field. Yes, some
Pakistani companies or groups do have their own lobbyists and pay a retainer
accordingly, but there has never been a sustained and organized institutional
approach in understanding and lobbying within the right circles in Washington.
Sadly, the many representative bodies of the Pakistani Diaspora in USA have
also been delinquent in this respect. The prime reasons being ego-trips and
protecting own turfs. Lessons should be learned from how the Indians and
Bangladeshi private sector work the ropes in Washington.
Pakistan may have to wait for a year or two,
once ILO does the necessary inspection and certification of Pakistan under the Better
Work program. Till then, the government and private sector need to do some
serious introspection. Meantime, I have prepared the Appeal for the licensees
and vendors for newspapers. I have also sent the following comment to NEWSPOST
of The News International: “It seems that Mickey Mouse has made the Pakistan
government look like Goofy, who is not sure where he is going, and the
exporters made to look like Donald Duck, the Walt Disney icon who does not wear
any bottoms"
MOCK MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT PREPARED BY MAJYD AZIZ
Dear Majyd saheb, you have taken up the issue in right earnest. CSR is a serious issue for the business especially Occupational Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) components for ILO's 'Decent Work' approach. Incidently the Institution of Engineers Pakistan has published a book 'An Introduction to Occupational Health, Safety and Environment', perhaps the first book in Pakistani scenario that could help understand the HSE issues. This book is a humble contribution by this scribe and can be had from the IEP Karachi Centre, Tele: 021-3278 1492, 3278 0233.
ReplyDeleteFPCCI and IEP are also committed to enhance 'Awareness on HSE and CSR' through dedicated programs for the business and industry. 'Decent Work' approach and CSR are not an expense, it is investment for quality, profitability and image of the corporations.
Engr. Anwar H. Siddiqui