Majyd Aziz
The European Union Parliament
presented a year-end gift to Pakistan by according the status of GSP Plus that
should provide a much needed boost in exports, especially textiles and leather.
Everyone concerned with this achievement patted themselves on the back for a
job well done. It did not matter who did what or how or what really spurred the
EU Parliament to take a positive decision. However, in the initial euphoria, it
seemed that stakeholders completely forgot the importance of what is nonchalantly
referred to as non-traditional exports. Minerals, for example.
Various trade development policies and frameworks did provide
incentives and subsidies for many items but there has never been a focused
attention accorded to minerals. There is the usual bragging that Pakistan is richly endowed with natural
resources and has billions of tons of coals to last a century, etc, etc but
actions speak louder than words. The Pakistan Strategic Trade Policy Framework (2012-15) earmarked only “Rs 20 million for
subsidy at 100 per cent of the prevailing mark-up rate for establishing mining
and processing units in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.” Interestingly,
the same amount is allocated for Women’s
Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Why are minerals exports in the slow lane? Can minerals enhance the
economic figures? Are the stakeholders serious? Is there a strategy to focus on
minerals? The answers are neither satisfactory nor encouraging because there
has seldom been an institutionalized approach to promote and project the
potential of minerals in the global marketplace. The stakeholders range from
the individual mine owners to the dealers, the transporters, the exporters, and
the government. It took years for the Board of Investment to make the shift
towards promotion of minerals. In the final days of the erstwhile government, a
Sector Advisory Board on Mining was constituted consisting of representatives
of Federal and Provincial governments, mine owners, exporters, and experts. A
couple of long and focused meetings of the Board have taken place and there has
been progress in formulating a workable approach to encourage mining and to
enable it to be a game changer in the export regime. The participants have come
up with attainable proposals and recommendations. It is hoped that the
government would take decisions based on these deliberations in the Advisory
Board.
There are huge deposits of metals such as antimony, chrome ore, copper,
gold, iron ore, manganese, and zinc lead to name a few. In non-metallic,
Pakistan has deposits of aragonite, marble, basalt, agglomerate, granite, onyx
marble, different kinds of clay, barite, dolomite, feldspar, gypsum, limestone,
phosphate, quartz, pumice, rock salt, silica sand, soap stone, and of course,
coal. What all these amount to are potent reserves that could transform the
nation from a begging bowl syndrome
to a country with sovereign foreign
exchange reserves.
Pakistan must get out of the dependence on just traditional exports as
the main revenue generators. The country can never enhance the export regime by
dabbling in a limited number of ten or twelve sectors and concentrating on merely
protecting whatever share these products have in the world market. It is time
to move out of the narrow shell that has been the base for past many decades. A
shift towards development of minerals also brings a marked change in the lives
of citizens living in undeveloped areas of the country. Unemployment and social
deprivation in these areas can best be addressed if opportunities are provided
at their doorsteps rather than compelling them to move to the already congested
and highly competitive urban areas.
It should now be
abundantly clear to anyone who has the welfare of Pakistan at heart that the
future of the people and the whole country depends not only on broad-based and concentrated
industrial development but that the mining of precious minerals can thoroughly serve
the interests of the country as a motivation for the development of other non-traditional
sectors of the national economy. The major drawbacks in mining are the
non-availability of competent technical workforce, the total reliance on
antiquated and manual mining mechanisms which results in inconsistency of
quality and productivity, the lack of quality assurance testing services at
mine mouth or within the proximity, the low availability of transportation
resulting in higher trucking charges, the difficulty in accessing the mines due
to non-existent road network, and more threateningly, the worrisome law and
order situation, including regular attacks by so-called secessionists. The hard
and dangerous living conditions in most of the mining areas in Balochistan and
Khyber Pakhtun Khwa impact severely on the progress of mining too.
It is imperative
that a paradigm shift is made to bring about a revolution in minerals
development. This is where the stakeholders must now concentrate. It is
incumbent upon the government to recognize the need to assist and facilitate
those who are committed to develop the potential of exports of minerals as well
as promote the utilization of minerals for domestic requirements. The
government must provide freight subsidy of Rs 500 per tonne from mine mouth to
port, export consignments certification charges subsidy upto 50% through Export
Development Fund, exemption from Withholding Tax, as well as preferential
support of atleast 3% of FOB to encourage this sector.
There is a need
to set up a Minerals Promotion Council as envisaged for leather and services
sector in the Strategic Trade Policy Framework (2012-15). It is also proposed
that the government-owned SME Bank Ltd must be nominated as the focal bank to
provide financial facilities to mine owners, dealers, and exporters and that
the government must make an infusion of atleast one billion Rupees in the Bank
for this sector.
Trade Development
Authority of Pakistan must be directed to encourage and subsidize the
participation of exporters of minerals at various global minerals exhibitions
and conferences so that minerals are promoted at international forums. Minerals
must be included in all present and future Free Trade Agreements as well as
Preferential Trade Agreements. Educational institutions must be directed by the
Higher Education Commission to introduce mining technology courses to train
technologists to improve productivity, quality, and value addition of minerals
(for example through beneficiation of minerals). 100% subsidy must be given by
government to students from mining areas.
It is only
through concerted efforts and detailed planning would Pakistan be able to
attract foreign investment in mining. The stage has to be set before the act
can begin. Instilling confidence and improvement in conditions are essential. The
target for 2014 should be set at $750 million and by end of 2015 the country
should cross the billion-dollar threshold. Pakistan must make the giant leap
forward. Minerals will result in deliverance for Pakistan. Debacles such as the
Reko-Dig Project must be avoided in future to restore confidence of
international investors. The protectors of the country must heed the advice of Indian
businessman Anil Agarwal who said, “If
left-wing extremism continues to flourish in parts which have natural resources
of minerals, the climate for investment would certainly be affected.”
http://pakistanhorizon.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/majyd-aziz-balagamwala-making-minerals-a-national-priority/
ReplyDelete